• Home
  • Courses
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Cart
  • My Account
      • Categories

        • Full Course
        • Industry Course
        • PhD
        • Premium Course
        • Research Methods
          • Literature Review
          • MCDM
          • Quantitative
        • Short Course
        • Software
          • Excel
          • R Studio/Python
          • SPSS/STATA
        • Become a Teacher
      • 0
      • RegisterLogin
    Research HUB
    • Home
    • Courses
    • Store
    • Blog
    • Cart
    • My Account
        • Categories

          • Full Course
          • Industry Course
          • PhD
          • Premium Course
          • Research Methods
            • Excel
            • Full Course
            • Industry Course
            • Literature Review
            • MCDM
            • PhD
            • Premium Course
            • Quantitative
            • R Studio/Python
            • Research Methods
            • Short Course
            • Software
            • SPSS/STATA
          • Short Course
          • Software
            • Excel
            • Full Course
            • Industry Course
            • Literature Review
            • MCDM
            • PhD
            • Premium Course
            • Quantitative
            • R Studio/Python
            • Research Methods
            • Short Course
            • Software
            • SPSS/STATA
          • Become a Teacher
        • 0
        • RegisterLogin

      Research Methods

      • Home
      • Blog
      • Research Methods
      • Common Issues in Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and their Solutions

      Common Issues in Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and their Solutions

      • Posted by RESEARCH HUB
      • Categories Research Methods
      • Date March 26, 2021
      • Comments 0 comment

      This post presents some very common issues we face when doing Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Most of the problems and their remedies are either taken from a book or academic social interactions, e.g. Research Gate. Courtesy to all sources are mentioned along with the respective post/suggestion.

      •  Problem 1: What are the goodness-of-fit criteria in structural equation model (SEM)?

      Source: Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River

      • Problem 2: What is the acceptable range for factor loading in SEM?

      In CFA models there are some displays concerning the fitness level of your model. If these displays are in the suitable ranges which are widely known in the literature, do not worry about the factor loadings. But I strongly recommend you to conduct a EFA first to assess your variables then go on with CFA. In EFA it is widely accepted that items with factor loadings less than 0.5, and items having high factor loadings more than one factor are discarded from the model. You can filter your model via EFA.

      • Problem 3: Any Citation for Cronbach alpha more than 0.6 is acceptable?

      -Define reliability using Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.7 , (Hair, 2005).

      -According to Ramayah (2011), Cronbach’s alpha coefficient values of more than 0.7 are considered good but values of more than 0.5 are acceptable.

      -According to Sekaran and Bougie (2013), reliabilities less than 0.6 are considered to be poor, those in the range of 0.7 – 0.79 are said to be acceptable, and those above 0.8 are said to be good.

      •  Problem 4: What can we do when Cronbach’s alpha is below 0.7?

      “Nunnally (1978) recommended calculation of coefficient alpha (also known as Cronbach alpha) in order to assess the reliability of a multiple-item variable. Churchill and Peter (1984) suggested an accepted level for the alpha coefficient. According to them a value of alpha below 0.60 is undesirable. Nunnally (1978; 1988) indicated that new developed measures can be accepted with an alpha value of 0.60, otherwise, 0.70 should be the threshold. However, considering the use of these scales for the first time in a new culture, the cut off value for the alpha coefficient was set up for 0.60 for all the scales (self-developed scales).”

      Another comment on problem 4:

      Thus if you have an alpha of 1 then scale is useless, the items are identical and not capturing the breadth of the construct, so too perfect an alpha is not acceptable.

      If you have an alpha of 0.5 (you think it is a unidimensional scale) then the items are not hanging together very well and you probably do not have a unidimensional scale (back to factor analysis)

      Practical issues about alpha.

      Alpha is affected by the intercorrelations of items and importantly the number of items. low correlations reduce alpha

      An Alpha calculated on Pearson correlations for dichotomous items will be an underestimate, similarly for item responses with less than 7 points

      An alpha calculated on 20 items will be an overestimate etc.

      Thus with 5 to 10 items with 7 or higher point scales, an alpha below 0.7 suggests you have a poor scale, check which items, one at a time, improve the alpha by removal. an alpha of 0.95 says you have too many items and you may want to remove the items that do not affect the size of alpha.

      •  Problem 5: What is the acceptable value of Average Variance Extracted (AVE)?

      In this article: http://www.ijiet.org/papers/267-IT0040.pdf found the following:

      Average Variance Extracted (AVE) is higher than 0.5 but we can accept 0.4. Because Fornell and Larcker said that if AVE is less than 0.5, but composite reliability is higher than 0.6, the convergent validity of the construct is still adequate (Fornell & Larcker, 1981)

      1. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of marketing research, pp. 39-50, 1981.

      Another comment on problem 5:

      I tend to agree with Marcie. AVE < .5 does not convey sufficient variance for the variables (items/questions) to converge into a single construct, which means items are less-than-effective measure of the latent construct. There’s more error variance than explained variance.

      The logic is that:

      when an item loading is .71, then it’s communality is .50 because communality is the loading square.

      Thus, AVE < .50 means, on average item loading is less than .70 (Hair et al., 2010, p.777)

      This also explains while your loadings are good (.60), AVE is less than perfect (< .50.).

      Remedies:

      Check variance inflation factor (VIF) to see if multicollinearity is an issue in your dataset.

      if VIF > 5, then check  your construct correlation. If any constructs’ correlation is more than .80 or .85 then you can combine these constructs as one.

      Note that, this is subject to your underpinning theory.

      Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

      •  Problem 6: How to include control variables in a structural equation model (SEM)?

       

      You may consider the following books for learning SEM:

      • SEM in MPLUS 
      • SEM in SPSS/AMOS
      • Latent growth modelling

      If you are interested in learning SEM, you may enroll in Structural Equation Modeling course by Research HUB.

      This post is compiled by Dr. Ziaul Hqure Munim, the founder of the ResearchHUB.

      Ziaul Haque Munim is an Associate Professor at the School of Business and Law of University of Agder, Norway. His main research interests include maritime logistics, transport economics, supply chain management and international business. Dynamics of container shipping freight rates is one of his special interests. He received the Best Paper Award at the IAME 2016 Conference in Hamburg, and was nominated for the Best Young Researcher Award at the IAME 2017 Conference in Kyoto. Follow his research on ResearchGate and Google Scholar.

      Ziaul’s published articles using SEM:
      1. Young people’s perceived service quality and environmental performance of hybrid electric bus service

      2. The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade
      3. Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework

      4. Individualism, Collectivism and Reward Crowdfunding Contribution Intention and Behavior

      Tag:Average Variance Extracted, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Control Variable, Cronbach Alpha, Model fit, SEM fit index, Structural Equation Modeling, Variance Inflation Factor

      • Share:
      RESEARCH HUB
      RESEARCH HUB

      This is Research HUB admin profile, managed by the support team.

      Previous post

      Student experience at the University of Adelaide, Australia
      March 26, 2021

      Next post

      Checklist for Structural Equation Modelling
      March 26, 2021

      You may also like

      AHP Structure
      New free course on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
      1 October, 2021
      Steps in Vector Autoregressive (VAR) and Vector Error Correction (VEC) Models
      26 March, 2021

      Check stationarity of time series using ADF or PP test. Check co-integration using Johansen co-integration test. If you find any co-integration equation, go for VEC model. However, VAR is fine too for simplicity. Estimation parameters do not differ drasticially. Decide on …

      Correlation plot
      Checklist for Structural Equation Modelling
      26 March, 2021

      Leave A Reply Cancel reply

      You must be logged in to post a comment.

      Search

      Categories

      • Career
      • Journal Publication
      • New To Research
      • News
      • PhD
      • Research Methods
      • Scholarships
      • Study Abroad Stories
      • University Ranking
      SPSS for Beginners

      SPSS for Beginners

      Free
      Understanding Academic Journals

      Understanding Academic Journals

      Free
      Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

      Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

      Free

      ABOUT US

      FOR STUDENTS

      FOR INSTRUCTORS

      FOR INSTITUTIONS

      FAQs

      DONATE

      CONTACT US

      WAIVER POLICY

      Research HUB University by RESEARCH HUB AS (ORG. NO. 927384086).

      Login with your site account

      Lost your password?

      Not a member yet? Register now

      Register a new account

      Are you a member? Login now

      We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
      Do not sell my personal information.
      Cookie SettingsACCEPT
      Manage consent

      Privacy Overview

      This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
      Necessary
      Always Enabled
      Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
      CookieDurationDescription
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
      viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
      Functional
      Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
      Performance
      Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
      Analytics
      Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
      Advertisement
      Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
      Others
      Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
      SAVE & ACCEPT